A report on the BBC and some stats from IO9.com piqued my interest this afternoon. The stats show that the most downloaded show (according to media snooping company BigChampagne) is Heroes.
Heroes; 54,562,012
Lost; 51,151,396
24; 34,119,093
Prison Break; 29,283,591
House; 26,277,954
Fringe; 21,434,755
Desperate Housewives; 21,378,412
Grey's Anatomy; 19,916,775
Gossip Girl; 19,706,870
Smallville; 19,598,999
The numbers are the number of downloads, apparently. The BBC says that the number of films and TV shows being downloaded, rather than music, is on the increase. Hmmm....
Personally I have never downloaded a movie. I love films, but I also like to own things. Downloading music and movies just feels wrong to me - music because I grew up in the age of vinyl and had a large collection, and the best part about coming home from a record fair was poring over the gorgeous sleeve artwork and reading all the notes while playing the album. Still nothing quite like that, but I still buy CDs. Now however they are immediately ripped to FLAC for archiving and the CD is put on the shelf for display. There is no emotional connection any more. Its a real shame, and once you lose that connection to the product it feels less obviously a crime to just take it.
Movies I won't download because I like going to the cinema, despite the overpricing, sticky floors and noisy bastards who seem to just want to talk once they are there. I've also spent a fair bit over the years building up a collection of movies and setting aside a room as a dedicated home cinema. After that, I don't want to be putting a DVD-R with a hastily scribbled label on it into my player. Nothing different about the quality of the output, but somehow the quality of the experience is lessened. I don't buy into the argument about wanting to see what it's like without wasting money, movies should be watched on a big screen, not a laptop, and you have no right to complain that a movie is rubbish if you haven't paid to see it.
Now TV. That is a different thing. It is a mass-broadcast media, which means you have every chance to watch it if it's broadcast where you live. Unfortunately on this score I live in the UK, where we have cheap recycled unimaginative shit on the box most of the time - wall-to-wall reality shows, "talent" shows, even the drama is mostly based around the same few ideas, usually police detective or something of that genre. It's pitiful.
I watch very little UK-origin TV now. What I do watch is largely US drama, comedy and sci-fi - House, BSG, The wire, The Shield, ER, 24, True Blood, Dexter, Burn Notice... I could go on. SOme of these are made available on a couple of cable-only channels which means I have to pay extra for the priviledge of watching something of good quality. Thing is, they are usually shown months later, the series has often finished in the States and been spoiled on the Internet long before I can legally have a chance to watch it. Hence, TV is the only thing I download, because I genuinely want to watch the shows. I have a wall full of the series boxsets, which again I gladly buy when they are available, for the shows that I've loved and watched again and again. I will even buy US versions of the boxsets if they are better (the "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" boxsets for example are in the correct 4:3 ratio only on the US releases). But again, DVD companies tried to prevent even this by region locking the discs so you have to have a multi-region player to be able to watch the discs. Luckily this isn't a problem any more, and Blu-Ray is largely region-free so it seems the companies saw the error in this policy.
Looking at the report on the BBC site, a few things stand out:
"This is a socially acceptable form of casual piracy - and it is replacing viewing hours." - er, no it isn't. It's telling you what people enjoy watching. It should be guiding your programming, and what you make available around the world.
"Big Champagne's research also shows that the rate of piracy for live events, such as sport or talent shows, is much lower than that for popular drama series." - instead of pushing shit like the X Factor and Britain's Got Talent just because crazy-cat-lady was popular on YouTube, how about making these "most downloaded" shows more widely available, as people clearly want them?
"The research also looks at unauthorised film downloads and shows they are getting lower audiences than those for TV programmes." - yes, because films are a one-off. If you show quality TV to people you will likely have ongoing viewers.
Honestly, I hope someone is learning this time instead of taking the knee-jerk reaction that the other media companies have (who have made things worse for themselves). I would gladly pay extra if I could customise my TV viewing to an extent where I can just get the things I want to watch - which is basically what I do by downloading TV which is unavailable to me any other way. I would pay for a legal torrent service to get US TV and drama, charged by what I download - or even free but with adverts where they would be if they were being broadcast. I'd like to be able to get HBO, Showtime and the other major channels over here. I would also like to see the archive opened, which I think the BBC is working on - my other major download source is for old TV shows and documentaries which will never see the light of day on DVD. Why should I not be allowed to watch these things again?
Anyway, I'm off to watch a (legal!) DVD...
3151b989-c31f-4220-a7c4-cb603e1366c0|0|.0
Tags:
geek,
movies,
tv,
piracy,
opinion
Categories:
TV |
piracy